华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 笔记本电脑评测

华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 笔记本电脑评测--980 克重的镁合金超极本，令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板1200 nit OLED 和 Core Ultra 9。 MateBook X Pro 是华为的旗舰笔记本电脑，新款 2024 型号的重量已减至 1 千克以下。此外，它的 IPS 屏幕换成了 OLED 触摸屏，亮度可达到 1000 尼特以上，画质令人印象深刻。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/07/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 AI Intel Intel Evo Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Ultrabook Touchscreen Windows

华为 MateBook X Pro 的 2022 和 2023 型号属于用钱能买到的最好的 14 英寸超极本。随着新款 2024 版本的发布，该制造商的目标是将标准定得更高，将更轻薄的镁合金外壳与柔性 OLED 面板（仍为 3,120 x 2,080 像素，纵横比为 3:2）相结合，从而使重量比上一代产品减少了近 300 克。这款笔记本电脑的新型 OLED 触摸屏的最大 HDR 亮度应该超过 1,000 cd/m²，并覆盖 AdobeRGB 色彩空间。我们想知道，其轻薄的结构是否真的带来了更好的整体包装，或者是否因为重量更轻而需要做出太多妥协。

我们测试的新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 是高端机型，配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H、32 GB LPDDR5x 6400 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘以及上述 OLED 触摸屏面板，当前售价约为 2,600 美元。其入门价格（酷睿至尊 7 155H、16 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘）目前略高于 2,200 美元。

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 (MateBook X Pro Series)ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-HGraphics adapterIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2350 MHz, 31.0.101.5445Memory32 GB , LPDDR5x-6400, dual-channel, onboardDisplay14.20 inch 3:2, 3120 x 2080 pixel 264 PPI, capacitive, VisN236HUZ15, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzMainboardIntel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCHStorageWD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, 2048 GB , 1824 GB freeSoundcardIntel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)Connections1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 13.5 x 310 x 223Battery70 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 1080pPrimary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 6-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90W PSU, 24 Months WarrantyWeight980 g, Power Supply: 236 g

Price2500 EuroLinksHuawei homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice

89 %v7 (old)06 / 2024Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core980 g13.5 mm14.20"3120x2080

87.4 %v7 (old)04 / 2024Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core1.2 kg11.6 mm14.00"2880x1800

86.7 %v7 (old)02 / 2024Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core1.2 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800

90 %v7 (old)08 / 2023LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGi7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs987 g16.5 mm14.00"2880x1800

90.8 %v7 (old)02 / 2024Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core1.1 kg14.96 mm14.00"2880x1800

89.6 %v7 (old)06 / 2023Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs1.3 kg15.6 mm14.20"3120x2080

88.6 %v7 (old)05 / 2024Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAR7 8840HS, Radeon 780M1.2 kg14.9 mm14.00"1920x1200

外壳 - 浅蓝色镁合金 MateBook X Pro 2024 的三种颜色版本与 2023 年推出的前代产品相比，新款 MateBook X Pro 采用了更纤薄、更轻巧的外壳。 的前代产品相比相比，新机型的重量仅为 980 克。一拿起笔记本电脑，你就会发现它非常轻巧。即便如此，它的质量依然很好，并继续使用镁合金。磨砂表面手感舒适，不会留下太多指纹痕迹。它的每一面边框都很窄，屏占比高达 87%。

我们的高端机型采用了新的莫兰迪蓝配色，与旧机型相比，蓝色调更浅。而基本款则为黑色，你也可以选择带有黑色键盘的白色款。

它的制造质量很好，但由于重量较轻，在稳定性方面需要做出一些妥协。尤其是中间的键盘区域会有明显的凹陷，从而导致一些细微的吱吱声。此外，机箱底盖非常薄，中间缺少一个固定夹。在这个区域，有一些空气，你可以从笔记本电脑中听到一些嘎吱嘎吱的声音。尽管如此，这在日常使用中应该不会造成任何问题。

显示屏的盖子也非常薄，而且相当容易弯曲。当试图扭动它时，我们注意到一些听起来像胶水脱落的声音。不过，由于显示屏采用的是 OLED 面板，这并没有导致任何图像错误。铰链很平滑，单手就能轻松打开笔记本电脑，但在调整打开角度（最大 135 度）或进行更剧烈的运动时，屏幕会有轻微的晃动。在操作触摸屏时也会出现这种情况。

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

如前所述，新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的重量仅为 980 克，非常轻巧，甚至低于 LG Gram Style 14。 LG Gram Style 14的 987 克还要低，而 LG 的机身厚度也要稍厚一些。其最大的竞争对手三星 Galaxy Book4 Pro 14重约 250 克，但其厚度更薄，结构更稳定。尽管 MateBook X Pro 采用 14.2 英寸面板，但它的体积却相当小巧。附带的 90 瓦电源包括 USB-C 线缆总重 236 克。

尺寸比较

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 华为取消了耳机插孔与上一代产品相比，新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的接口更少了。侧面的两个 USB-C 接口少了一个，3.5 毫米音频接口也被完全取消。这款笔记本电脑的供货范围至少包括一个简单的 USB-C 入耳式耳机。在设备的左侧，仍然有两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口，你仍然可以选择在两侧为 MateBook X Pro 2024 充电。此外，右侧还有一个网络摄像头快门开关。此外，MateBook 还可以使用熟悉的超级设备功能与其他华为设备轻松通信，例如交换数据。

左：2x USB-C 4.0，带 Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbit/s）、DisplayPort、Power Delivery

右：网络摄像头快门、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort、Power Delivery）交流华为继续使用著名的英特尔 AX211 模块，支持 6 GHz（Wi-Fi 6E）和蓝牙 5.3，但尚未提供 Wi-Fi 7。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的标准化 WLAN 测试中，其传输速率约为 1.7 Gbit/s，在同类产品中属于最快、最稳定的。在日常使用中，我们也从未遇到过任何连接问题。

NetworkingHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1685 (min: 1578) MBit/s ∼97%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1731 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1645 (min: 1487) MBit/s ∼95%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1556 (min: 1430) MBit/s ∼90%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1638 (min: 1574) MBit/s ∼94%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1654 (min: 1582) MBit/s ∼96%

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

936 (min: 757) MBit/s ∼54%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

928 (min: 467) MBit/s ∼54%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1630 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1665 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼99%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1002 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼58%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1183 (min: 848) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1226 (min: 1162) MBit/s ∼75%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1444 (min: 1310) MBit/s ∼86%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

591 (min: 549) MBit/s ∼34%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

938 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼54%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1353 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1682 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼99%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1685 (1578-1721) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1731 (1704-1753)

网络摄像头总的来说，MateBook 的 1080p 网络摄像头没有任何变化，除了华为熟悉的 AI 功能外，它现在还支持 Windows 的工作室特效（柔焦、自动居中等）。华为软件还提供其他功能（虚拟背景、美颜滤镜）。网络摄像头本身的质量也不错。

11.9 ∆E12.1 ∆E13.4 ∆E14.7 ∆E10.4 ∆E10.7 ∆E10.7 ∆E8.1 ∆E11.2 ∆E5.7 ∆E12.3 ∆E6.6 ∆E4.4 ∆E12.7 ∆E12.9 ∆E3.8 ∆E8.1 ∆E12.1 ∆E4.5 ∆E6.7 ∆E10.1 ∆E6.3 ∆E3.4 ∆E8.7 ∆EColorChecker Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: 9.22 ∆E min: 3.41 - max: 14.68 ∆E

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024

维护与之前的机型一样，华为为用户拆卸机壳底盖设置了不必要的困难。背面的两个橡胶脚垫下有两个隐藏的螺丝。但是，由于橡胶脚垫粘得非常紧，几乎不可能在不造成损坏的情况下将其取下。

底面，胶合后橡胶脚垫下有隐藏的螺丝。输入设备 - MateBook X Pro 仍配备出色的键盘新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 的纤薄机身对其键盘没有任何影响，因为它的键程仍然是 1.5 毫米，与 2023 机型直接对比，我们注意到在键盘上打字的感觉没有任何区别。得益于其较大的键程和精准的按键，用户仍能获得笔记本电脑领域最好的键盘体验之一。从舒适度的角度来看，它可以轻松与最新的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12.键盘布局合理，只是垂直方向键有点偏小。电源键位于键盘本身外侧的右上方，指纹传感器也位于该键内。键盘采用两级白色背光，遗憾的是仍无法自动激活。

输入设备

键盘背光华为也没有改变笔记本电脑的触觉触摸板。点击时的反馈是由振动电机产生的，因此无论你在哪里点击，都能获得相同的反馈，而且产生的噪音非常小，感觉质量很高。边缘上还有更多手势，名为 FreeTouch。例如，可以在右侧边缘调节音量，并支持网格效果（例如，亮度在左侧，视频时间轴在顶部）。当然，电容式触摸屏还可用于输入，操作起来也没有任何问题。

显示屏 - 柔性 OLED，亮度超过 1,200 尼特子像素阵列

最大 HDR 亮度华为在新款 2024 MateBook X Pro 上将 IPS 面板换成了 OLED 显示屏，但其技术规格仍保持不变。14.2 英寸屏幕的纵横比仍为 3:2，分辨率为 3,120 x 2,080 像素。相比之下，其刷新率提高到了 120 Hz。主观而言，它的画质令人印象深刻，内容描绘清晰锐利，色彩看起来超级鲜艳。与三星最新的有机发光二极管一样，尽管是触摸屏，但在描绘光线区域时不会出现光栅效应问题。

另一方面，华为的柔性 OLED 面板在亮度方面明显有别于三星的竞争产品--在标准 SDR 工作模式下，新款 MateBook X Pro 的平均亮度已达到 624 cd/m²（三星目前为 400 cd/m²）。在 HDR 工作模式下，差异就更大了，因为在显示图像摘录时，我们注意到最高亮度达到了 1,220 cd/m²。在显示几乎全白的画面时，我们测得的亮度为 911 cd/m²，这仍然是非常好的（三星：最大亮度约为 640 cd/m²）。这些数值令人震惊，目前在 OLED 笔记本电脑中是无与伦比的。OLED 面板没有任何背光渗色问题，响应速度也超快。此外，它还能通过传感器自动调节亮度和色温。

607cd/m²613cd/m²627cd/m²608cd/m²613cd/m²636cd/m²617cd/m²640cd/m²656cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessVisN236HUZ15 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 656 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 624.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %Center on Battery: 613 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}calibrated: 1.5ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6447 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024VisN236HUZ15, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2"Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSamsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Samsung ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"Display-4%1%0%1%-7%-3% Display P3 Coverage99.897 -3%99.8 0%99.92 0%99.7 0%89.8 -10%98.6 -1% sRGB Coverage100100 0%100 0%100 0%100 0%99.4 -1%99.9 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage94.685.2 -10%97.6 3%94.71 0%98.2 4%84.2 -11%87.3 -8%Response Times-26%-19%-238%-38%-1948%-110% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *0.75 ?(0.4, 0.35)0.83 ?(0.43, 0.4) -11%0.69 ?(0.37, 0.32) 8%2 ?(1, 1) -167%0.91 ?(0.54, 0.37) -21%20 ?(6, 14) -2567%1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62) -75% Response Time Black / White *0.49 ?(0.25, 0.24)0.69 ?(0.38, 0.31) -41%0.71 ?(0.38, 0.33) -45%2 ?(1, 1) -308%0.76 ?(0.41, 0.35) -55%7 ?(2, 5) -1329%1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59) -145% PWM Frequency1440240 ?(100)480 ?(80)350240.3156000 ?(50)480 ?(99)Screen-8%6%-36%7%-23%6%Brightness middle613392 -36%391 -36%384 -37%417 -32%595 -3%387 -37%Brightness624398 -36%392 -37%388 -38%417 -33%550 -12%386 -38%Brightness Distribution9397 4%98 5%97 4%98 5%85 -9%98 5%Black Level *0.020.0540.250.01Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.91.3 32%1.1 42%2.47 -30%1.26 34%2.01 -6%1 47%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.13.2 -3%2.4 23%4.33 -40%3.6 -16%6.9 -123%2.4 23%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.52.81 -87%0.68 55%1.22 19%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.12.3 -10%1.3 38%2.63 -25%1.3 38%2.74 -30%1.4 33%Gamma2.2 100%2.24 98%2.17 101%2.18 101%2.27 97%2.4 92%2.24 98%CCT6447 101%6517 100%6336 103%6279 104%6355 102%6319 103%6466 101%Contrast195507111238038700Total Average (Program / Settings)-13% /

-10%-4% /

0%-91% /

-61%-10% /

-2%-659% /

-340%-36% /

-18%* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro2）对面板进行了分析，同时查看了所有不同的色彩配置文件。这对用户来说有点麻烦，因为标准配置是激活本地配置文件（P3），而您必须使用快捷键激活专业模式，该模式会激活摄影色彩配置文件（P3-65）。不过，在测试过程中，专业模式的效果较差，因此我们再次将其停用。其他配置文件可通过显示管理器获得，该管理器仅显示在 Windows 的第二个右键菜单中（右键单击桌面 -> 显示更多选项 -> 显示管理器）。根据华为的说法，所有设备都经过预校准，DeltaE-200 的平均偏差小于 1，但我们无法证实这一点。

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：AdobeRGB，目标色彩空间：AdobeRGB）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：AdobeRGB，目标色彩空间：AdobeRGB）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：AdobeRGB，目标色彩空间：AdobeRGB）

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）Native 配置文件提供了一个良好的基础，没有色调或明显的色温偏差。其平均色彩偏差为 1.9，非常不错，只有个别颜色超过了 3 的重要临界值，偏差达到 3.1。如果使用 sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 配置文件，情况会更糟，因为偏差会更大。此外，AdobeRGB 色彩空间并没有完全覆盖。由于偏差较大，这意味着该面板不是编辑照片/视频的理想选择。

通过我们自己的校准（可在上面免费下载配置文件），与 P3 参考机型相比，我们能够在灰度和色彩方面略微改善显示效果。不过，在日常使用中还是没有必要这样做。

CalMAN 灰度校准（目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 饱和度校准（目标色彩空间：P3）

已校准 CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间：P3）

对比 sRGB

对 P3

对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White0.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.25 ms rise↘ 0.24 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise↘ 0.35 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 1440 HzThe display backlight flickers at 1440 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 1440 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 0）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 20）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 40）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 60）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 80）

PWM 闪烁（亮度为 100）OLED 面板采用 PWM 技术，但 MateBook X Pro 又一次将自己与竞争对手明显区分开来。它使用直流调光，亮度在 43% 以下为 240 Hz，亮度在 43% 以下为 1,440 Hz。这个数值非常高，因此用户即使在低亮度水平下使用笔记本电脑，也不会受到很大的限制。

在阳光下

室外

OLED 触摸屏一般会反光，但反光程度不如三星Galaxy Book4 等产品。加上 SDR 的高亮度，即使在明亮的室外环境中，也能轻松使用该设备。在第一张照片中，你可以清楚地看到阳光直射下的补偿效果（对于反光显示屏而言）。对于其视角稳定性，我们也没有任何负面意见。

视角性能 - 配备 Meteor Lake H 处理器的 MateBook X Pro新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 采用英特尔的 Meteor Lake 移动处理器，提供酷睿至尊 7 155H 和 16GB 内存，或酷睿至尊 9 185H 和 32GB 内存（LPDDR5x-6400）。不提供 64 GB 内存或更快的内存选项。

测试条件华为为 MateBook X Pro 2024 提供两种不同的性能配置文件：平衡型和性能型。我们在下表中总结了它们各自的性能和排放值。默认情况下，MateBook 始终在 "性能"模式下启动，这也是我们在以下基准测试和测量中使用该模式的原因。原则上，平衡模式当然也能满足日常使用的需要，但总是需要手动切换到该模式，而且笔记本电脑不会自己记住设置，这一点非常恼人。

能源概况

CPU TDP

Cinebench R23 Multi

Time Spy 图形

最大风扇噪音排放

平衡

80 -> 36 瓦

13,199 分

3,280 分

39.9 分贝(A)

性能

80 -> 45 瓦

15,270 分

3,719 分

46.8 分贝(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 185HMateBook X Pro 2024 的顶级型号采用了最新的 酷睿至尊 9 185H处理器。这是目前流星湖系列中速度最快的移动处理器，最高主频为 5.1 GHz。在 MateBook 内，该处理器短时间内的最大功耗为 80 瓦，之后在长期负载情况下，功耗会平衡在 45 瓦。鉴于其轻巧纤薄的机身，这些高功耗限制带来了相应的高性能值，测试设备也因此领先于竞争对手。虽然无法长时间保持高性能，但笔记本电脑的连续多核性能（-30%）还是很有竞争力的，与对比设备相比，总体上更好、更稳定。至少与其他英特尔竞争对手相比是这样，因为 华硕 Zenbook 14配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS华硕 Zenbook 14 采用 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS，在 30 瓦的功耗下比酷睿 Ultra 9 在 45 瓦的功耗下获得了更好的性能。这充分说明英特尔芯片相比之下是多么低效。新的 Lunar Lake 芯片可能会在这方面有所帮助，但首批设备上市还需要几个月的时间，而 AMD 的 Zen5 芯片已经在研发之中。

在电池模式下，它的性能并没有降低，进一步的 CPU 基准测试可参见 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø1990 (1887.33-2694.15) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1454 (1146.23-2135.5) Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Standard mode: Ø1477 (1223.99-2297.13) LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1209 (1178.03-1454.97) Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1920 (1441.75-2297.27) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1613 (1476.83-1993.62) Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

84.1 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

80.6 pt Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

76.8 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

75 pt Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

73.9 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 -2! Intel Core i7-1360P

68.3 pt Average of class Subnotebook

67.9 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

67.5 pt LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

53.5 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=19)

17767 Points +16%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

15270 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

14583 (10835.5min - 14582.8max) Points -4%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

13888 Points -9%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

12794 Points -16%Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=73, last 2 years)

12168 Points -20%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

11571 Points -24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

11428 Points -25%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

8557 Points -44%Cinebench R23 / Single Core

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

1848 Points +2%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1812 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1166 - 1912, n=19)

1787 Points -1%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1772 Points -2%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

1746 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1730 Points -5%Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=73, last 2 years)

1696 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1664 Points -8%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

1596 Points -12%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=19)

6862 Points +20%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5705 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5433 Points -5%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

5414 Points -5%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

5104 Points -11%Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=67, last 2 years)

4722 Points -17%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

4526 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

4413 Points -23%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

3273 Points -43%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

719 Points +5%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (442 - 735, n=19)

689 Points 0%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

688 Points Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

679 Points -1%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

673 Points -2%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

657 Points -5%Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=67, last 2 years)

646 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

636 Points -8%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

611 Points -11%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=21)

2729 Points +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

2694 (1887.33min - 2694.15max) Points Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

2297.13 (1223.99min - 2297.13max) Points -15%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2297 (1441.75min - 2297.27max) Points -15%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

2176 (2149.96min - 2176.16max) Points -19%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2136 (1146.23min - 2135.5max) Points -21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

2008 Points -25%Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=72, last 2 years)

2008 Points -25%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

1455 (1178.03min - 1454.97max) Points -46%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

268 Points +3%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

267 Points +2%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (191.9 - 281, n=19)

264 Points +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

261 Points Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=68, last 2 years)

257 Points -2%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

255 Points -2%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

248 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

238 Points -9%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

180 Points -31%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

387 Seconds * -65%Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=69, last 2 years)

366 Seconds * -56%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

297 Seconds * -26%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

295 Seconds * -26%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

270.8 Seconds * -15%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

241 Seconds * -3%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

235 Seconds * Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

226 Seconds * +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=19)

191.1 Seconds * +19%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51738 - 76331, n=19)

69330 MIPS +20%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

61047 MIPS +6%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

57730 MIPS Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

53528 MIPS -7%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

51896 MIPS -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

48748 MIPS -16%Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=65, last 2 years)

47447 MIPS -18%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

45679 MIPS -21%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

36940 MIPS -36%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

6205 MIPS +10%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

5717 MIPS +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5648 MIPS Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

5470 MIPS -3%Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=67, last 2 years)

5469 MIPS -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4199 - 5781, n=19)

5427 MIPS -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5410 MIPS -4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5151 MIPS -9%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

4647 MIPS -18%Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

13756 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=19)

13602 Points -1%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

12971 Points -6%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12171 Points -12%Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=77, last 2 years)

11882 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

11786 Points -14%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

11279 Points -18%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

8909 Points -35%Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core

Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=72, last 2 years)

2603 Points +4%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

2552 Points +2%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

2507 Points Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

2454 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=19)

2430 Points -3%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2420 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2287 Points -9%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

2003 Points -20%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9330 - 14230, n=19)

13179 Points +3%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

12822 Points Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

12469 Points -3%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

11567 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

10951 Points -15%Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=63, last 2 years)

10551 Points -18%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

9897 Points -23%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

8909 Points -31%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

8621 Points -33%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

1942 Points +6%Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=63, last 2 years)

1864 Points +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1839 Points Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1805 Points -2%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

1792 Points -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (986 - 1902, n=19)

1779 Points -3%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1768 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1691 Points -8%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

1435 Points -22%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=19)

19.9 fps +26%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

17 fps +8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

16.1 fps +2%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

15.8 fps Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

14 fps -11%Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=67, last 2 years)

13.3 fps -16%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

12.7 fps -20%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

11.9 fps -25%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

9.89 fps -37%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF

Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=65, last 2 years)

55.1 s * -43%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

49.6 s * -29%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

47.8 s * -24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

46.4 s * -21%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

46.1 s * -20%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (34.5 - 73.5, n=19)

46.1 s * -20%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

44.8 s * -16%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

40.3 s * -5%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

38.5 s * R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P

0.566 sec * -25%Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=67, last 2 years)

0.529 sec * -17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.511 sec * -13%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4996 sec * -10%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4789 sec * -6%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4313 - 0.759, n=20)

0.47 sec * -4%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P

0.4578 sec * -1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

0.4525 sec * Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

0.4521 sec * -0%* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit261 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2694 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit168.2 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)5705 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)688 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core1812 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core15270 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core828 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core108 Points

Help... in comparison

Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

87.9 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

86.4 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

73.1 pt Average of class Subnotebook

65.7 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

60.9 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

57.6 pt Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

56.9 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

52.2 pt LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

48.5 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

22269 KRay/s +84%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=19)

16396 KRay/s +36%Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=67, last 2 years)

13722 KRay/s +14%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

12075 KRay/s Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

9618 KRay/s -20%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

8899 KRay/s -26%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

8627 KRay/s -29%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

8569 KRay/s -29%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

7838 KRay/s -35%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

93550 Points +47%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=19)

85141 Points +34%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

63748 Points Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=67, last 2 years)

61705 Points -3%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

48441 Points -24%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

47266 Points -26%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

45333 Points -29%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

43630 Points -32%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

41145 Points -35%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

4132 MB/s +35%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=19)

3982 MB/s +30%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

3060 MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=67, last 2 years)

3044 MB/s -1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

2404 MB/s -21%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

2290 MB/s -25%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

2065 MB/s -33%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

1940 MB/s -37%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

1930 MB/s -37%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

99874 Points +17%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=19)

89708 Points +6%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

89068 Points +5%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

85817 Points +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

85010 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

81758 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

80348 Points -5%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

74566 Points -12%Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=67, last 2 years)

71020 Points -16%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

13731 Points +55%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=19)

10546 Points +19%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

8851 Points Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=67, last 2 years)

7372 Points -17%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

7326 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

7257 Points -18%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

7034 Points -21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

6597 Points -25%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

5415 Points -39%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

49687 Points +60%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=19)

41756 Points +35%Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=67, last 2 years)

32414 Points +4%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

31021 Points Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

23884 Points -23%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

22705 Points -27%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

22621 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

21139 Points -32%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

19395 Points -37%AIDA64 / CPU AES

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

116441 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=19)

91381 MB/s -22%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

87671 MB/s -25%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

76247 MB/s -35%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

64363 MB/s -45%Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=67, last 2 years)

57085 MB/s -51%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

50795 MB/s -56%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

45713 MB/s -61%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

37967 MB/s -67%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=19)

1163 MB/s +37%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

918 MB/s +8%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

849 MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=67, last 2 years)

752 MB/s -11%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

689 MB/s -19%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

686 MB/s -19%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

557 MB/s -34%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

549 MB/s -35%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

468 MB/s -45%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

11637 KRay/s +79%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=19)

8582 KRay/s +32%Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=67, last 2 years)

7282 KRay/s +12%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

6503 KRay/s Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

5193 KRay/s -20%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

4660 KRay/s -28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

4503 KRay/s -31%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

4379 KRay/s -33%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

4129 KRay/s -37%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44547 - 53918, n=19)

48798 MPixel/s +7%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

48270 MPixel/s +6%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

45628 MPixel/s Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

44535 MPixel/s -2%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

44495 MPixel/s -2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

43772 MPixel/s -4%Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=67, last 2 years)

43582 MPixel/s -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

40426 MPixel/s -11%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

35861 MPixel/s -21%

系统性能在合成系统基准测试中，新款 MateBook X Pro 的表现同样出色，经常大大领先于竞争对手。平心而论，你不得不承认，所有现代笔记本电脑在日常使用中都非常快，你不会真正注意到各个对比设备之间的真正差异。在测试过程中，MateBook 对输入的响应速度非常快，而且我们没有发现任何系统稳定性问题。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

7403 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (6771 - 7510, n=5)

7204 Points -3%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

7157 Points -3%Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7883, n=55, last 2 years)

6786 Points -8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

6751 Points -9%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

6527 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

6331 Points -14%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

5672 Points -23%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

5621 Points -24%PCMark 10 / Essentials

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

11331 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (10135 - 11331, n=5)

10820 Points -5%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

10732 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

10662 Points -6%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

10630 Points -6%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

10526 Points -7%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

10502 Points -7%Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=55, last 2 years)

10486 Points -7%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

9883 Points -13%PCMark 10 / Productivity

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

10449 Points +11%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

9384 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8797 - 10484, n=5)

9322 Points -1%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

9031 Points -4%Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10842, n=55, last 2 years)

8964 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

8778 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

8030 Points -14%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

7244 Points -23%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

7180 Points -23%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

10353 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8793 - 10781, n=5)

10092 Points -3%Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=55, last 2 years)

9096 Points -12%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

9056 Points -13%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

8873 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

8043 Points -22%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

7939 Points -23%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

6982 Points -33%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

6259 Points -40%CrossMark / Overall

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

1971 Points Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

1876 Points -5%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1675 - 1971, n=5)

1792 Points -9%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1698 Points -14%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

1656 Points -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1643 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

1630 Points -17%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1605 Points -19%Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=65, last 2 years)

1596 Points -19%CrossMark / Productivity

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

1875 Points Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

1829 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1589 - 1875, n=5)

1702 Points -9%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1658 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1584 Points -16%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

1583 Points -16%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

1564 Points -17%Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=65, last 2 years)

1526 Points -19%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1523 Points -19%CrossMark / Creativity

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

2102 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1883 - 2102, n=5)

1977 Points -6%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

1917 Points -9%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1863 Points -11%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1842 Points -12%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

1817 Points -14%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

1813 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1782 Points -15%Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=65, last 2 years)

1778 Points -15%CrossMark / Responsiveness

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

1899 Points +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

1889 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1329 - 1889, n=5)

1568 Points -17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1438 Points -24%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

1435 Points -24%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1428 Points -24%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

1342 Points -29%Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=65, last 2 years)

1330 Points -30%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1201 Points -36%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

440 Points +50%Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=66, last 2 years)

317 Points +8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

294 Points 0%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

293 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (264 - 293, n=5)

280 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

269 Points -8%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

255 Points -13%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

249 Points -15%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=66, last 2 years)

269 Points +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

266.6 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

258 Points -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (248 - 267, n=5)

256 Points -4%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

248 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

246 Points -8%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

243.5 Points -9%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

234 Points -12%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

218 Points -18%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

612 ms * -17%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

610 ms * -17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

562 ms * -8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

544 ms * -4%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

522 ms * Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (508 - 532, n=5)

522 ms * -0%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

521 ms * -0%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

518 ms * +1%Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=73, last 2 years)

497 ms * +5%* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score

7403 pointsHelp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

95353 MB/s +18%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

88119 MB/s +9%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=19)

84413 MB/s +4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

84290 MB/s +4%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

80867 MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=67, last 2 years)

80439 MB/s -1%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

76766 MB/s -5%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

68974 MB/s -15%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

64187 MB/s -21%AIDA64 / Memory Read

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

87297 MB/s +15%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

85295 MB/s +13%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=19)

79657 MB/s +5%Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=67, last 2 years)

76811 MB/s +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

75722 MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

75550 MB/s 0%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

63509 MB/s -16%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

58321 MB/s -23%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

57933 MB/s -23%AIDA64 / Memory Write

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

107658 MB/s +42%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

83155 MB/s +10%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

82872 MB/s +9%Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=67, last 2 years)

81925 MB/s +8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

75930 MB/s 0%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

75866 MB/s Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

74292 MB/s -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=19)

72498 MB/s -4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

72172 MB/s -5%AIDA64 / Memory Latency

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

154.2 ns * -11%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=19)

145.5 ns * -5%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

138.3 ns * Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

137.3 ns * +1%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

132.3 ns * +4%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M

114.5 ns * +17%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

106.4 ns * +23%Average of class Subnotebook (6.8 - 187.8, n=66, last 2 years)

103.7 ns * +25%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

95.4 ns * +31%* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有受到任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序出现故障，但重要的 "中断到处理延迟 "值很低。

LatencyMon - 概述

LatencyMon - 驱动程序

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P

6070.1 μs * -884%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2087.5 μs * -238%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

1751.4 μs * -184%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

1550 μs * -151%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1102.5 μs * -79%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

616.7 μs * Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

435.7 μs * +29%* ... smaller is better

存储设备我们的高端测试设备配备了 2 TB 版本的 WD SN740。这款 M.2 2280 固态硬盘通过 PCIe 4.0 连接，传输速率超过 5 GB/s。此外，即使在长时间负载的情况下，其性能也能保持完全稳定。 这对于快速固态硬盘来说并不总是必然的。一个令人困惑的主要问题仍然是制造商对固态硬盘的分区，因为在首次启动设备后，系统硬盘上只有 145 GB 是空闲的。因此，如果你在安装和下载时不小心，很快就会收到硬盘已满的提示。这根本不切实际，也没有必要。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdWD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

5028 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

4481 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

866 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

790 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

68.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

231 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:

2111 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:

2050 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdWD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00Sequential Read:

4090MB/s

Sequential Write:

4114MB/s

4K Read:

53.9MB/s

4K Write:

204MB/s

4K-64 Read:

1114MB/s

4K-64 Write:

2026MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.022ms

Access Time Write:

0.02ms

Copy ISO:

3869.15MB/s

Copy Program:

417.01MB/s

Copy Game:

1362.48MB/s

Score Read:

1577Points

Score Write:

2642Points

Score Total:

5035Points

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdWD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

5252MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

4503MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

3268MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

4479MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

2684MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

2669MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

67.4MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

252MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

5229MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

80.6 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

73.7 pt LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

73.5 pt Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

68 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

64 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

61.6 pt Average of class Subnotebook

60.9 pt Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

49.9 pt Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

46.2 pt DiskSpd

seq readLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

3934 (3872.6min - 3934.05max) MB/s +20%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

3454 (3421.58min - 3453.8max) MB/s +6%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

3268 (3212.21min - 3267.78max) MB/s Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1734 - 3494, n=6)

3005 MB/s -8%Average of class Subnotebook (688 - 4852, n=66, last 2 years)

2929 MB/s -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2690 (2667.9min - 2690.44max) MB/s -18%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2379 (2365.59min - 2378.73max) MB/s -27%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2156 (2126.3min - 2155.87max) MB/s -34%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

2089 (1958.25min - 2089.39max) MB/s -36% seq writeHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

4479 (4368.79min - 4479.46max) MB/s Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

3772 (213.28min - 3772.36max) MB/s -16%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

3522 (3235.7min - 3521.96max) MB/s -21%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1597 - 4487, n=6)

3457 MB/s -23%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

3258 (2856.06min - 3257.7max) MB/s -27%Average of class Subnotebook (102.8 - 4695, n=66, last 2 years)

2842 MB/s -37%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2604 (2525.41min - 2604.03max) MB/s -42%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2388 (2203.69min - 2388.49max) MB/s -47%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2309 (2175.85min - 2309.38max) MB/s -48% seq q8 t1 readLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

6978 (5832.18min - 6977.55max) MB/s +33%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

6861 (6174.88min - 6861.46max) MB/s +31%Average of class Subnotebook (694 - 13544, n=66, last 2 years)

5494 MB/s +5%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

5252 (4708.3min - 5251.69max) MB/s Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (5041 - 5265, n=6)

5175 MB/s -1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

4886 (4359.86min - 4886.36max) MB/s -7%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

4671 (3796.43min - 4671.2max) MB/s -11%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

4504 (3696.49min - 4504.05max) MB/s -14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

3596 (3014.03min - 3596.41max) MB/s -32% seq q8 t1 writeLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

6149 (6105.44min - 6149.48max) MB/s +37%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

5454 (5383.53min - 5454.06max) MB/s +21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

4503 (4392.07min - 4503.21max) MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (107 - 9702, n=66, last 2 years)

4255 MB/s -6%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

3881 (113.46min - 3881.41max) MB/s -14%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1617 - 4595, n=6)

3790 MB/s -16%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3164 (3094.35min - 3164.36max) MB/s -30%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3105 (3076.1min - 3105.46max) MB/s -31%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2446 (2406.49min - 2445.7max) MB/s -46% 4k q1 t1 readSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

75.8 (74.48min - 75.75max) MB/s +12%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

74.3 (72.71min - 74.33max) MB/s +10%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

67.4 (66.77min - 67.43max) MB/s Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (54 - 67.4, n=6)

60.1 MB/s -11%Average of class Subnotebook (19.9 - 95.2, n=66, last 2 years)

59.5 MB/s -12%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

53.5 (53.24min - 53.45max) MB/s -21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

43.7 (23.85min - 43.65max) MB/s -35%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

34.6 (34.41min - 34.64max) MB/s -49%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

29.4 (29.32min - 29.4max) MB/s -56% 4k q1 t1 writeHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023

360 (353.95min - 359.55max) MB/s +43%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

252 (249.66min - 252.37max) MB/s Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (87.7 - 252, n=6)

180.8 MB/s -28%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

157.7 (151.37min - 157.68max) MB/s -37%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

157.4 (157.1min - 157.44max) MB/s -38%Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 287, n=66, last 2 years)

149.8 MB/s -41%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

149.4 (143.79min - 149.44max) MB/s -41%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

117.9 (117.39min - 117.9max) MB/s -53%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

84.9 (82.69min - 84.93max) MB/s -66% 4k q32 t16 readHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

2684 (2611.54min - 2684.42max) MB/s Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

2252 (2223.45min - 2252.41max) MB/s -16%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1827 (1806.76min - 1827.02max) MB/s -32%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (308 - 2684, n=6)

1432 MB/s -47%Average of class Subnotebook (207 - 4286, n=66, last 2 years)

1187 MB/s -56%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

909 (848.35min - 908.51max) MB/s -66%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

749 (367.29min - 748.63max) MB/s -72%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

624 (570.35min - 624.14max) MB/s -77%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

283 (280.76min - 282.69max) MB/s -89% 4k q32 t16 writeHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

2669 (2574.17min - 2669.35max) MB/s Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1709 (1672.77min - 1708.93max) MB/s -36%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

1611 (217.51min - 1610.59max) MB/s -40%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (209 - 2871, n=6)

1525 MB/s -43%Average of class Subnotebook (115.9 - 5007, n=66, last 2 years)

863 MB/s -68%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

435 (416.7min - 435.33max) MB/s -84%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

396 (367.7min - 396.43max) MB/s -85%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

364 (358.35min - 363.86max) MB/s -86%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

222 (208.14min - 221.73max) MB/s -92%AS SSD

Score TotalHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023

6213 Points +23%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

5035 Points LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

4914 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

4895 Points -3%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (4065 - 6068, n=6)

4790 Points -5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

4401 Points -13%Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 9875, n=64, last 2 years)

4199 Points -17%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3408 Points -32%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3295 Points -35% Score ReadHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023

2872 Points +82%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1916 Points +21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

1577 Points Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (872 - 2238, n=6)

1517 Points -4%Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 4048, n=64, last 2 years)

1338 Points -15%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

1232 Points -22%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1217 Points -23%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

1116 Points -29%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

787 Points -50% Score WriteLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

3125 Points +18%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

2817 Points +7%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

2642 Points Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1726 - 2803, n=6)

2521 Points -5%Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=64, last 2 years)

2236 Points -15%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2186 Points -17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2038 Points -23%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

1894 Points -28%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1632 Points -38% Seq ReadLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

5421.49 MB/s +33%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

5228 MB/s +28%Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 8075, n=64, last 2 years)

4271 MB/s +4%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

4090 MB/s Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

3934 MB/s -4%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3900 MB/s -5%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3675 MB/s -10%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (193.2 - 4236, n=7)

3593 MB/s -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

3186 MB/s -22% Seq WriteHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

4114 MB/s LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

3432 MB/s -17%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

3205 MB/s -22%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

3061.96 MB/s -26%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (80.9 - 4114, n=7)

3037 MB/s -26%Average of class Subnotebook (99 - 5120, n=64, last 2 years)

2810 MB/s -32%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

2234 MB/s -46%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2172 MB/s -47%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1996 MB/s -51% 4K ReadHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023

96.2 MB/s +78%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

62.83 MB/s +17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

62.2 MB/s +15%Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 89.2, n=64, last 2 years)

58.4 MB/s +8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

54.95 MB/s +2%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

53.9 MB/s Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (50.2 - 58.5, n=6)

52.7 MB/s -2%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

51 MB/s -5%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

48.1 MB/s -11% 4K WriteLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

206.5 MB/s +1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

204 MB/s Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

189.9 MB/s -7%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (117.7 - 217, n=6)

181.5 MB/s -11%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

177.1 MB/s -13%Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 251, n=64, last 2 years)

168.9 MB/s -17%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

168.1 MB/s -18%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

149.39 MB/s -27%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

145.4 MB/s -29% 4K-64 ReadHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023

2382 MB/s +114%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1535 MB/s +38%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

1114 MB/s Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (403 - 1773, n=6)

1048 MB/s -6%Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 3417, n=64, last 2 years)

852 MB/s -24%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

798 MB/s -28%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

646 MB/s -42%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

518.62 MB/s -53%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

349 MB/s -69% 4K-64 WriteLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

2575 MB/s +27%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

2361.9 MB/s +17%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

2026 MB/s Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (1220 - 2374, n=6)

1986 MB/s -2%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1818 MB/s -10%Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=64, last 2 years)

1783 MB/s -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

1669 MB/s -18%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

1384 MB/s -32%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1238 MB/s -39% Access Time ReadHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023

0.136 ms * -518%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

0.082 ms * -273%Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=64, last 2 years)

0.0568 ms * -158%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

0.05 ms * -127%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (0.022 - 0.075, n=6)

0.04183 ms * -90%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

0.039 ms * -77%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.023 ms * -5%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.022 ms * -0%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

0.022 ms * Access Time WriteAsus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.102 ms * -410%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.1 ms * -400%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02

0.081 ms * -305%Average of class Subnotebook (0.018 - 0.316, n=64, last 2 years)

0.0645 ms * -223%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU

0.032 ms * -60%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023

0.03 ms * -50%Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 (0.018 - 0.033, n=6)

0.02217 ms * -11%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00

0.02 ms * LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGSK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

0.018 ms * +10%* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5229 (4950.07-5240.99)

图形卡 - Intel Arc GraphicsGPU-Z 英特尔弧形图形处理器Core Ultra 9 185H 配备了快速版的新英特尔 Arc Graphics，它拥有 8 个 Xe 内核，最高主频可达 2.35 GHz。与旧版 Iris Xe Graphics G7 相比，英特尔大幅提升了其性能，这就是为什么新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 在 GPU 测试中提供的功率几乎是 2023 型号的两倍。 2023 型号的两倍。此外，这是迄今为止我们测试过的最快的 Arc iGPU 之一。AMD 的 Radeon 780M在合成测试中也明显落于下风。

在过去的几个月中，英特尔一直在为其新的 Arc iGPU 不断发布驱动程序更新，这款机型的游戏性能也得益于此。事实上，在实际游戏测试中，MateBook X Pro 2024 将Zenbook 14 的 Radeon 780M 甩在了身后，但在合成测试中，它的领先优势要小得多，两款机型的表现几乎一样。在游戏测试中，新的 Arc iGPU 比 MateBook X Pro 2023 内的旧版 Iris Xe 图形处理器 "只 "高出约 50%。

在Time Spy 压力测试（99.3%）和Witcher 3 循环测试中，MateBook X Pro 2024 的 GPU 性能保持完全稳定。此外，在电池模式下，其性能也没有降低。更多 GPU 基准测试，请访问技术版块。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.4 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

99.4 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

89.9 pt Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

88.6 pt Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

87.1 pt Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

83.1 pt Average of class Subnotebook

80.4 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

75 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 -1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

53.6 pt LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

48.9 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

13556 Points Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

12999 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12230 Points -10%Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8064 - 13716, n=38)

11751 Points -13%Average of class Subnotebook (995 - 16296, n=64, last 2 years)

10150 Points -25%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

9702 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

9085 Points -33%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

6752 Points -50%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

5885 Points -57%3DMark

1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

9160 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

8561 Points -7%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

8441 Points -8%Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5568 - 9692, n=42)

8203 Points -10%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

7673 Points -16%Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=67, last 2 years)

7577 Points -17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

7278 Points -21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

5477 Points -40%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

5354 Points -42%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

3719 Points Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (2018 - 3770, n=45)

3212 Points -14%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3206 Points -14%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3001 Points -19%Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=66, last 2 years)

2980 Points -20%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

2876 Points -23%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2846 Points -23%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

1656 Points -55%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

1495 Points -60%Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

34628 Points +3%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

33583 Points Average of class Subnotebook (11490 - 58402, n=61, last 2 years)

30819 Points -8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

30817 Points -8%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

30010 Points -11%Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17193 - 37639, n=44)

29774 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

25139 Points -25%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

20881 Points -38%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

20322 Points -39%Geekbench 6.4 - GPU OpenCL

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

36741 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

35267 Points -4%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32096 Points -13%Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17911 - 39941, n=44)

31967 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

29185 Points -21%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

28473 Points -23%Average of class Subnotebook (9487 - 52427, n=71, last 2 years)

27698 Points -25%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

16121 Points -56%

3DMark 11 Performance

13398 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

8516 points3DMark Time Spy Score

4088 pointsHelp... in comparison

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

709 Seconds * -72%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

562 Seconds * -36%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P

537 Seconds * -30%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

535 Seconds * -30%Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=69, last 2 years)

528 Seconds * -28%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

437 Seconds * -6%Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=41)

433 Seconds * -5%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

412 Seconds * Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

369 Seconds * +10%* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance Rating - Percent

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

93.7 pt Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

90.6 pt Average of class Subnotebook

82.6 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

78.9 pt Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

67.6 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

63.3 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

63.3 pt LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

50.8 pt The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

29.6 (27min, 27P1) fps +14%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

25.9 (16min, 22P1) fps Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

25.5 (23min) fps -2%Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=37, last 2 years)

24 fps -7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

20.4 (16min, 18P1) fps -21%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

19.2 (11min, 13P1) fps -26%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

16.4 fps -37%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

10 fps -61%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

25.7 (2.69min, 16.4P1) fps +34%Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=63, last 2 years)

22 fps +15%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

19.2 (2.77min, 14.5P1) fps Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

14.2 (2.16min, 9.09P1) fps -26%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

14.1 (0.852min, 2.6P1) fps -27%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

11.5 (6.52min, 7.87P1) fps -40%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

11 (0.636min, 4.48P1) fps -43%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

10.7 (3.95min, 7.94P1) fps -44%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

30.8 fps Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

27.6 fps -10%Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=68, last 2 years)

26.1 fps -15%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

23.9 fps -22%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

21.2 fps -31%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

21 fps -32%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

19 fps -38%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

14.7 fps -52%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

56 fps Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

49 fps -12%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

47 (5.9min, 9.85P1) fps -16%Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=64, last 2 years)

45.4 fps -19%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

38.8 (5min, 9.64P1) fps -31%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

31 fps -45%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

28.7 (6.7min, 10.1P1) fps -49%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

24.6 (5min, 7P1) fps -56%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

80.9 (51.2min) fps Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

75 (63.4min) fps -7%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

72.3 (50.8min) fps -11%Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=72, last 2 years)

66.7 fps -18%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

63.9 (44.2min) fps -21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

59.6 (50.1min) fps -26%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

59.6 (44min) fps -26%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

53.4 (44.6min) fps -34%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

43.9 fps Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

40.8 fps -7%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

35.7 fps -19%Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=60, last 2 years)

35.5 fps -19%Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M

32.3 fps -26%LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

31.4 fps -28%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

31.2 fps -29%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU

30.2 fps -31%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø25.9 (16-28)

lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)

158.8

148.1

48.9

19.2

The Witcher 3 (2015)

158

97

57

25.9

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

105

99.9

80.6

80.9

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

80.1

43.4

30.8

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

66.6

51.9

43.9

Far Cry 5 (2018)

69

47

43

41

Strange Brigade (2018)

188

82

69

56

F1 23 (2023)

89.3

79.8

54.5

15

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

36.4

30.2

27.6

24.7

排放物 - 冷却装置略微过载噪音排放根据华为的说法，它的散热得到了改进，正如我们已经看到的那样，对于如此轻薄的设备来说，它的功率限制是非常高的。不过，在日常使用中（无论使用哪种能源模式）并不会保持非常安静，即使在空闲模式下，风扇也会经常运转。在执行简单任务时，噪音就已达到 34 dB（A）左右。这个噪音相当高，很快就会让人厌烦。此外，两种能量曲线的表现几乎完全相同，在我们的压力测试中，性能模式的噪音甚至比平衡模式更大（46.8 对 39.9 分贝（A））。在这里，更好的分级是有意义的。

Noise Level

Idle

24.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A)Load

34 / 46.8 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLUAsus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101NLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360PAsus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HARadeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMNoise10%9%6%11%0%5%off / environment *24.824.5 1%23.4 6%25 -1%23.8 4%25.4 -2%25.1 -1%Idle Minimum *24.824.5 1%23.4 6%25 -1%24 3%25.4 -2%25.1 -1%Idle Average *29.824.5 18%23.4 21%25 16%24 19%25.4 15%25.1 16%Idle Maximum *29.824.5 18%24.5 18%25 16%24 19%29.6 1%25.1 16%Load Average *3432.4 5%39.3 -16%37 -9%31.5 7%42 -24%35.9 -6%Witcher 3 ultra *39.936.7 8%35.9 10%37 7%37.8 5%39.3 2%Load Maximum *46.836.7 22%39.3 16%40.62 13%37.8 19%40.9 13%42.2 10%* ... smaller is better

温度当笔记本电脑空转和日常使用时，处理器周围的区域已经明显发热，将笔记本电脑放在大腿上时也能明显感觉到。不过，这通常不会造成任何限制，而且新机型的性能实际上比旧机型略胜一筹 MateBook X Pro 2023.当设备处于负载状态时也是如此，我们在底部测得的最高温度略低于 43 °C。我们在键盘中间区域测得的 43 °C温度让人感觉不那么舒适；虽然仍然可以打字，但在这种极端情况下，手指会变得非常热。另一个问题是 90 瓦的电源装置，在负载情况下（游戏时和压力测试时）温度高达 60-65 °C，实在太高了。

在 CPU/GPU 合并负载的压力测试中，我们最初测得处理器的负载为 80 瓦，随后处理器的负载立即降至 40 瓦。在平衡模式下，我们也在短时间内测得了 80 瓦的功率，但随后功率下降，几分钟后稳定在 25 瓦。

CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试

Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3

42 °C43.2 °C41.4 °C 38.2 °C42.4 °C39.4 °C 26.7 °C27 °C27 °C

Maximum: 43.2 °CAverage: 36.4 °C

42 °C42 °C41.9 °C39.1 °C40.9 °C38.3 °C27.4 °C29.1 °C27.7 °C

Maximum: 42 °CAverage: 36.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 65.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3

28.5 °C29.3 °C28.6 °C 26.9 °C27.9 °C27.1 °C 25 °C24.9 °C25 °C

Maximum: 29.3 °CAverage: 27 °C

29.4 °C29.7 °C29.3 °C27.2 °C28.6 °C27 °C25.4 °C26.1 °C25.6 °C

Maximum: 29.7 °CAverage: 27.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 30 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3

41.9 °C44.4 °C41.8 °C 37.4 °C43.6 °C39.3 °C 27.2 °C27 °C27.1 °C

Maximum: 44.4 °CAverage: 36.6 °C

43.9 °C43.6 °C43.4 °C39.6 °C42.4 °C38.6 °C28.5 °C29.6 °C27.7 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °CAverage: 37.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 59 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).

表面温度应力测试（顶部）

表面温度应力测试（底部）

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUAsus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPULG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsAsus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780MHeat7%7%9%-1%-11%1%Maximum Upper Side *43.241 5%40.9 5%36.3 16%44.2 -2%46.5 -8%43.1 -0%Maximum Bottom *4244.2 -5%46.8 -11%36.8 12%41.2 2%44.7 -6%50.2 -20%Idle Upper Side *29.325.3 14%24.1 18%29.2 -0%29.4 -0%34.9 -19%25.8 12%Idle Bottom *29.726.2 12%24.6 17%27.4 8%31.2 -5%32.9 -11%26.4 11%* ... smaller is better

发言人MateBook X Pro 2024 的音响系统由六个扬声器组成，与旧款 MateBook X Pro 2023 相比，华为在音质方面有所改进。它的声音洪亮而充沛--只是由于笔记本的设计，低音略显不足。即便如此，这也是其他笔记本电脑存在的问题，目前我们的数据库中还没有更好的音响系统。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 显示屏太亮会耗尽电池耗电量功耗主要由 OLED 面板决定，我们在最大 SDR 亮度下的空闲模式下测得的最大功耗为 16.4 瓦，明显高于大多数同类设备，是采用 IPS 面板的前代产品的两倍多。在这种情况下，你只需为如此高的亮度付出代价，在 HDR 模式下，面板的功耗甚至更高。在负载情况下，设备需要的最大功率为 94 瓦，因此设备会短暂达到电源装置的极限。在接下来的压力测试过程中，耗电量稳定在 75 瓦左右。因此，我们可以说 90 瓦的供电装置总体上太弱了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.42 / 1.37 WattIdle 9.3 / 16 / 16.4 Watt

Load

67.3 / 94.3 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2"Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGi7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAR7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Average of class Subnotebook Power Consumption40%32%43%35%32%46%29%43%Idle Minimum *9.35.7 39%6.1 34%3.58 62%3.9 58%4.1 56%3.6 61%5.34 ?(1.8 - 10.3, n=39) 43%4.22 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=68, last 2 years) 55%Idle Average *168.7 46%10 37%7.125 55%5.8 64%6.6 59%6.6 59%8.54 ?(4.2 - 16, n=39) 47%7.24 ?(2.5 - 16, n=68, last 2 years) 55%Idle Maximum *16.48.9 46%10.3 37%12.1 26%16 2%8 51%7.4 55%11.9 ?(4.5 - 49, n=39) 27%8.83 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=68, last 2 years) 46%Load Average *67.344.5 34%53.3 21%40.67 40%46.1 32%61 9%47.1 30%54 ?(31.3 - 76.2, n=38) 20%45.2 ?(13.8 - 78.6, n=66, last 2 years) 33%Witcher 3 ultra *64.636.9 43%42 35%50.4 22%56 13%47.4 27%Load Maximum *94.365.2 31%67 29%64.2 32%67.4 29%90 5%54.3 42%84.9 ?(60 - 144.9, n=39) 10%68.3 ?(30.8 - 121.2, n=68, last 2 years) 28%* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø64.6 (53.6-70.9) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø78.2 (74.1-94.4) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.2 (12.7-15.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø63.1 (56.3-92.4) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø92.3 (92.2-92.4) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø39.6 (34.9-43.7) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø83.3 (70.7-92.9) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø66.8 (57.6-78.4) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø61 (59.1-75.7) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.7 (9.7-13.7)

运行时间充电曲线华为将新机型的电池容量从 60 Wh 提高到了 70 Wh，但即便如此，其 WLAN 运行时间还是略有缩短。在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 58%）的 WLAN 测试中，MateBook 的续航时间为 8 分 19 秒。这比旧款少了 80 分钟，但比Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 多了 40 分钟。在全亮度的 WLAN 测试中，我们只用了大约 5 个小时，但你不应该忘记 MateBook 的亮度有多高。Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 能多用 1 小时，但它的显示屏比 MateBook 暗 200 多 cd/m²。当以 150 cd/m² 的亮度播放视频内容时，我们测得了约 12.5 小时的好成绩，而在全亮度条件下播放 HDR 视频仅用了 4.5 小时。

在负载情况下，笔记本电脑在最差情况下 70 分钟后就会关闭，而在设备打开的情况下，充满一次电需要 93 分钟。在我们的测试中，启动快速充电模式并没有进一步缩短充电时间。

请注意：与 Galaxy Book4 Pro 14一样，MateBook X Pro 2024 的活动信号模式仍为 120 赫兹，即使我们将频率降至 60 赫兹。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

8h 19min

WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness

4h 57min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

12h 36min

Load (maximum brightness)

1h 10min

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, 70 WhSamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 63 WhAsus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 WhLG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AGi7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 WhLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 57 WhHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 WhAsus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HAR7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 WhAverage of class Subnotebook Battery Runtime21%56%42%-4%21%56%50%H.264756917 21%1010 34%603 -20%527 -30%1046 38%993 ?(595 - 1425, n=29, last 2 years) 31%WiFi v1.3499458 -8%707 42%700 40%466 -7%580 16%774 55%783 ?(389 - 1585, n=69, last 2 years) 57%Load70104 49%134 91%145 107%70 0%124 77%123 76%112.8 ?(48 - 228, n=43, last 2 years) 61%

Pros+ 轻质镁合金外壳，触感极佳

+ 令人印象深刻的 OLED 显示屏

+ 出色的输入设备

+ 出色的系统性能

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 2TB 固态硬盘

+ 电池模式下性能不减Cons- 焊接式内存和难以维护的选择

- 超薄机身导致机箱稳定性下降

- 无 3.5 毫米插孔

- 日常使用中风扇活动频繁

- 不必要的固态硬盘分区

- 电源在负载情况下温度很高，而且功率不足

评语：2024 MateBook X Pro 的显示屏和重量令人印象深刻，但需要做出妥协华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 评测。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。初次见到新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 时，其轻巧的机身和出色的触感立刻让人眼前一亮。此外，它的 OLED 触摸屏拥有出色的画质，而且输入设备和扬声器也是移动领域中最好的。不过，与 2023 机型相比，其轻薄的机身确实有一些妥协。但首先要说明的是。

除了重量轻之外，用户体验的主要特点是笔记本电脑采用了全新的 OLED 显示屏，与三星的竞争对手相比，它具有出色的画质和更高的亮度值。超过 600 尼特的 SDR 亮度加上低反射水平，使 MateBook 可以在户外轻松使用。由于刷新率高，PWM 闪烁对大多数用户来说都不是问题。另一方面，随机提供的 sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 色彩配置文件并不是最准确的，这意味着该设备并不适合图像编辑。

机箱本身的稳定性有所下降，而且其显示屏盖子特别灵活--这可能会导致一些令人不快的噪音。中间的键盘区域也会被轻微压入，但在每次使用时，这都不会成为问题。说到连接选项，3.5 毫米插孔的缺失尤其令人遗憾，但反过来，输入设备的不变也是一个积极因素。它的键盘输入手感极佳，可以轻松与最好的商务笔记本电脑相媲美。不过，令人遗憾的是，华为仍然让用户很难买到组件。

新款华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 的低重量、出色的画质和高亮度 OLED 触摸屏给人留下了深刻印象。酷睿至尊 9 185H 的性能同样令人印象深刻，但其代价是风扇活动频繁--即使在执行简单任务时也是如此。

现在来谈谈这款笔记本电脑的性能，这是一把双刃剑。总体而言，酷睿至尊 9 185H 的性能非常出色，功耗限制也很高。同时，这也是英特尔最新 CPU 的最大问题，因为大功率需要大量电力。反过来，这也反映在该设备的风扇活动几乎是持续不断的，即使是在执行日常任务时也会明显发热。此外，它的电源太弱，在负载情况下也会发热。遗憾的是，它的高效模式几乎无法改善风扇活动，我们希望看到一个性能水平降低的静音模式。总而言之，MateBook X Pro 只需要一个更高效的处理器，但英特尔（目前）还没有合适的处理器。对于 MateBook X Pro 来说，25 瓦的 AMD Zen4 或 Zen5 处理器将是理想的散热选择，同时还能让它在性能方面与其他产品竞争。

它的电池续航能力一般，当然这主要取决于屏幕亮度。如果你要求设备在室外一直保持全亮度（与其他笔记本电脑相比，这样才能舒适地工作），那么如果你发现它的续航时间缩短了，也不必感到惊讶。

MateBook X Pro 2024 最大的竞争对手是 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14但它的 OLED 屏幕更暗、反光更强。更重的Galaxy Book4 的外壳稳定性更好，而 MateBook 的输入设备更好，性能也更强。LG Style 14 LG Style 14重量也不到 1 千克，几乎可以被动运行，但它的 OLED 显示屏较暗，输入设备较弱。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况新款 MateBook X Pro 2024 可在一系列在线零售商处购买，价格从美元 2,224.30 起。.

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024

- 06/05/2024 v7 (old)

Andreas Osthoff

Chassis81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard90%

Pointing Device100%

Connectivity61 / 75 → 81%

Weight75 / 20-75 → 100%

Battery85%

Display93%

Games Performance80 / 78 → 100%

Application Performance90 / 85 → 100%

Temperature79%

Noise85%

Audio92 / 91 → 100%

Camera44 / 85 → 51%

Average81%

89%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

More articles related to this deviceHuawei MateBook X Pro 2024 (MateBook X Pro Series)Review•华为MateBook X Pro 2023回顾--MacBo... |News•华为MateBook X Pro是最好的英特尔Evo笔记本电... |Review•华为MateBook X Pro 2022笔记本电脑评测。M...

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 460 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 600859 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!